Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

List of suggestions (map rotation, premium, plugins, votes)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • List of suggestions (map rotation, premium, plugins, votes)

    Hi everyone!

    I really enjoy playing on the server but there are a few things that I dislike about the premium system and map rotations.

    First, maps I think that could be removed:
    de_aztec - great map for 1v1, 2v2 but not 15v15. Terrorists have very limited opportunity.
    de_dust - A classic map, but fairly unbalanced and many people quit during the game. Similar reasons than aztec with player numbers. Could also be removed.
    de_dust2_2002_blabla - This is a huge remake of dust 2 with 3 bombspots, sniper towers and new pathways. Nobody seems to like it, so why not remove it?
    cs_militia - another unbalanced classic. CTs rarely get anything done on the server.
    cs_agency - too small and T sided. again, might be playable with 10 players but not 30.
    old inferno, old dust2, de_train_csgo etc. - older versions of actual maps - people get used to the angles on the new map, playing the old maps is very confusing and many dislike it aswell. Also, radar doesn't work.
    Maps that I don't really like but I don't know well enough to judge: workout, cruise, rush

    EDIT: de_airstrip_csgo (no map, confusing layout) Not sure about this one I kinda like it.

    Now to the map vote. It's a little sad, that people just vote to prevent a certain map. I miss "rockthevote" plugin (rtv). It would make us able to change a "bad" map on our own without any admin online and nominate better maps for the upcoming votes.
    Also, the maps suggested in the vote are sometimes the maps that we played 1 map before. Unfortunately, it looks like vanilla csgo doesn't provide config options to change it except for the current map not appearing in the vote, but maybe there's a plugin to change that so 4-5 maps have to be played in order for the map to show up again.

    Speaking of votes, I think it's impossible to get cheaters votebanned. I know it shouldn't be too easy but 70% instead of 95% sound logical to you?.(could disable voteban if there are less than 6 players)

    Next on my list is premium system.
    Let me mention first, I'm fine with the tactical nade. Although it can be annoying sometimes, it can be countered and picked up. The only problem is people can get stuck in the grenade -.-"
    But free awps... When your team wins the first round and nobody on your team can afford awps, why should the losing team get awps all of a sudden? It's too much of a bad surprise. I think that should be removed. Free Nova, Deagle, Mac10/MP9, CZ Auto / 57 / Tec9, Scout, Galil/Famas or even free defuser / nades are all fine. I don't mind free "eco guns", but awps are too strong to be free.
    Also, I think it should be considered to remove premium skins, they are not recognizable as either CT or T if you just see a leg or head. And I have the feeling that they are rendered a little bit later so you see people badly when they peak corners with a custom skin. Especially players new to the server will suffer the most from that.
    Lastly, friendly fire /healing system is not a big deal but it shouldn't work with your own grenades (molo). That gives you an advantage of throwing your own molo and running through at enemies which nobody expects, or being able to turn back through your own molo.

    That's it! List of complaints finished :]

    EDIT: Maybe we can change sniper restriction by default. I think in a 5 player team maximum should be 2 awps. So we could pick a different plugin that doesn't let us waste money on the awp and then finding out it's restricted, instead restrict the player to buy the gun or refund money / despawn the old gun and set awp+auto restrict on 40% of players.
    Last edited by fowst; 16.05.2018, 21:37.

  • #2
    Originally posted by fowst View Post
    Hi everyone!

    I really enjoy playing on the server but there are a few things that I dislike about the premium system and map rotations.

    First, maps I think that could be removed:
    de_aztec - great map for 1v1, 2v2 but not 15v15. Terrorists have very limited opportunity.
    de_dust - A classic map, but fairly unbalanced and many people quit during the game. Similar reasons than aztec with player numbers. Could also be removed.
    de_dust2_2002_blabla - This is a huge remake of dust 2 with 3 bombspots, sniper towers and new pathways. Nobody seems to like it, so why not remove it?
    cs_militia - another unbalanced classic. CTs rarely get anything done on the server.
    cs_agency - too small and T sided. again, might be playable with 10 players but not 30.
    old inferno, old dust2, etc. - older versions of actual maps - people get used to the angles on the new map, playing the old maps is very confusing and many dislike it aswell. Also, radar doesn't work.
    Maps that I don't really like but I don't know well enough to judge: workout, cruise, rush

    Now to the map vote. It's a little sad, that people just vote to prevent a certain map. I miss "rockthevote" plugin (rtv). It would make us able to change a "bad" map on our own without any admin online and nominate better maps for the upcoming votes.
    Also, the maps suggested in the vote are sometimes the maps that we played 1 map before. Unfortunately, it looks like vanilla csgo doesn't provide config options to change it except for the current map not appearing in the vote, but maybe there's a plugin to change that so 4-5 maps have to be played in order for the map to show up again.

    Speaking of votes, I think it's impossible to get cheaters votebanned. I know it shouldn't be too easy but 70% instead of 95% sound logical to you?.(could disable voteban if there are less than 6 players)

    Next on my list is premium system.
    Let me mention first, I'm fine with the tactical nade. Although it can be annoying sometimes, it can be countered and picked up. The only problem is people can get stuck in the grenade -.-"
    But free awps... When your team wins the first round and nobody on your team can afford awps, why should the losing team get awps all of a sudden? It's too much of a bad surprise. I think that should be removed. Free Nova, Deagle, Mac10/MP9, CZ Auto / 57 / Tec9, Scout, Galil/Famas or even free defuser / nades are all fine. I don't mind free "eco guns", but awps are too strong to be free.
    Also, I think it should be considered to remove premium skins, they are not recognizable as either CT or T if you just see a leg or head. And I have the feeling that they are rendered a little bit later so you see people badly when they peak corners with a custom skin. Especially players new to the server will suffer the most from that.
    Lastly, friendly fire /healing system is not a big deal but it shouldn't work with your own grenades (molo). That gives you an advantage of throwing your own molo and running through at enemies which nobody expects, or being able to turn back through your own molo.

    That's it! List of complaints finished :]

    OH and I almost forgot, ban eros.
    Decent suggestions about the maps. The rotations should be improved soon so these suggestions are very welcome.

    There is an admin available most of the time, either on the server or over Steam. They are usually happy to ban cheaters for you or to change maps.

    If the voteban threshold was lowered then a few players may be banned when they aren't even cheating. It'd be abused. Think the record is with Eros with 23 votebans, and I think Npanopjkee had 19. Just alerting an admin to come and ban them would be far quicker than waiting for a server full of bots to type voteban anyway.

    The skins really are a joke. There used to be one far worse though called "bikini girl". The hitbox was never anywhere near the moving figure, you literally had to miss your shot to actually get a kill it was that bad and it was abused by a few morally questionable people. The current skins aren't as bad but they are quite annoying.

    The free weapons alongside other things make VIP overpowered and I agree that it does make the server boring.

    "I do not have the right not to do so"

    Comment


    • #3
      I think vips should be offered only for noobs (99% of them are noobs anyways...)

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Dazzo
        maybe make a thread roy that lists the admins steams so people can add them on to call in. Like so -



        And more but i dont have complete list :P there did all the hard work lol
        That's a pretty good idea, might be worth asking them first before listing their steam profiles.

        "I do not have the right not to do so"

        Comment


        • #5
          Perhaps it's worth to cancel the VIP status on the 11 server or significantly weaken it (restrict) it there. Perhaps this will help 11 server and players

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Limard View Post
            Perhaps it's worth to cancel the VIP status on the 11 server or significantly weaken it (restrict) it there. Perhaps this will help 11 server and players
            Good idea but apparently it can't be done.

            "I do not have the right not to do so"

            Comment


            • #7
              It would be good if vips are restricted when it comes to distribute weapons to team mates .(mainly awp)
              Don't know if can be done or want to be done.

              What i also noticed is that many times the top players come "to help" when its almost team-switch , and when they change, they change togheter so now the other team gets raped, instead of balancing since the start, a good balance plugin would be welcome, also allowing admins switch VIP would be an improvement.
              Last edited by Gozzy; 15.05.2018, 17:20.

              Comment


              • #8
                Not wearing the skins is a massive help...I didnt realise they gave you so much more of a advantage..

                Comment


                • #9
                  oh and also, mp_limitteams 1 instead of 3 maybe... 5 vs 8 is not fair, whilst 5 vs 6 is perfectly alright.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X